<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
xmlns:rawvoice="http://www.rawvoice.com/rawvoiceRssModule/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clean Energy, Dirty Politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hpronline.org/business-of-america/clean-energy-dirty-politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hpronline.org/covers/business-of-america/clean-energy-dirty-politics/</link>
	<description>Harvard Talks Politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 19:28:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: China in the Lead: It Matters. &#171; The Harvard Political Review</title>
		<link>http://hpronline.org/covers/business-of-america/clean-energy-dirty-politics/comment-page-1/#comment-2979</link>
		<dc:creator>China in the Lead: It Matters. &#171; The Harvard Political Review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jul 2010 05:04:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2979</guid>
		<description>[...] stand by the article I wrote last fall about green jobs, because it absolutely did not argue against the imperative for clean energy. The [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] stand by the article I wrote last fall about green jobs, because it absolutely did not argue against the imperative for clean energy. The [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weighing in: China in the Lead &#171; The Harvard Political Review</title>
		<link>http://hpronline.org/covers/business-of-america/clean-energy-dirty-politics/comment-page-1/#comment-2957</link>
		<dc:creator>Weighing in: China in the Lead &#171; The Harvard Political Review</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2010 03:18:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-2957</guid>
		<description>[...] For our fall Business of America issue, Will himself wrote in his excellent article &#8220;Clean Energy, Dirty Politics&#8221; that The argument made by proponents of green jobs is a win-win-win: fix unemployment, protect the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] For our fall Business of America issue, Will himself wrote in his excellent article &#8220;Clean Energy, Dirty Politics&#8221; that The argument made by proponents of green jobs is a win-win-win: fix unemployment, protect the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

