HPRgument Blog — July 27, 2010 8:32 am

Joel Pollak Bravely Confronts Tyranny

By Sam Barr

Recent Harvard Law graduate Joel Pollak, running for Congress against Jan Schakowsky (D-IL), has invoked Steve Biko, the martyred South African anti-apartheid activist, in defense of Andrew Breitbart, the amoral media commentator who recently went after an innocent civil servant in order to advance his race-baiting political agenda.

According to Pollak, Breitbart embodies Biko’s “simple credo”: “I write what I like.”

Those are five inspiring words in the context of a protest against a tyrannical government, but when one likes to write false, manipulative things, as Breitbart does, I dare to suggest they are somewhat less noble.

Of course, Pollak thinks that Breitbart (and Pollak himself) are protesting against a tyrannical government: that of the Democrats in Washington. Says Pollak:

Last week, my opponent, Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-IL), called on me to denounce Andrew Breitbart and to end any further association with his website, BigGovernment.com.

Her attack was typical of a corrupt Washington elite that believes it is entitled to tell people what to say and where to say it.

So, you see, calling on a political opponent to renounce his association with a craven liar is tantamount to silencing the protests of an oppressed minority group.

One wonders how Pollak fared in Constitutional Law at Harvard. See how he cleverly interprets Schakowsky’s challenge (she is telling people “what to say and where to say it”) to suggest that she is threatening Pollak’s freedom of speech? Pollak then gets on his high horse: “The First Amendment is not a perk for members of Congress and their spouses.”

But it’s no violation of the First Amendment to criticize a person’s writings and associations. Schakowsky wasn’t suggesting that, if Pollak continued to contribute to Breitbart’s website, she’d move to have the website shut down. She was simply suggesting that the voters would punish him. And, judging from the make-up of the Illinois 9th, she’s probably right.

I guess when you’re running against an incumbent who won her last election with 75% of the vote, you need to do anything you can to stand out. Apparently, for Pollak, this includes throwing out everything he learned (or didn’t) in law school.

In quoting Biko’s admirable maxim, Pollak isn’t being a freedom fighter. He’s being a child.

Photo credit: Wikipedia

Related posts:

Obama Mad Libs
Biden and Gibbs Mad Libs
Google Sells Out
Breaking Down The Super Committee
  • Pingback: Breitbart/Sherrod: Sound and Fury « The Harvard Political Review

  • Bullwinkle

    When it comes to craven liars, I think Jan Schakowsky can hold her own with Mr. Breitbart! The rabid Crook County socialist got to see lying up close and personal when her husband – trusted Obama advisor & well-paid (by himself with funds obtained fraudulently), community organizer  Robert Creamer - served his time in the Federal pokey for bank fraud and tax evasion. Apparently his admission of guilt, prison sentence, & criminal record did not disqualify him from working with the president. It also appears the sweethearts from Evanston turned out to be in the group that doesn’t want to pay its fair share when it comes to taxes. Those damned greedy rich people!  

custom writing