HPRgument Blog — June 27, 2010 2:52 am

What’s not to love?

By Max Novendstern

Theda Skocpol is not one to mince words. Here she is, in classic form, on fiscal austerity measures:

The President, Congressional leaders, and Democrats of all stripes should be yelling day in, day out, that REPUBLICANS ARE SABOTAGING NATIONAL ECONOMIC RECOVERY AND PREVENTING JOB GROWTH, JUST FOR POLITICAL ADVANTAGE. That should be the message all the time, led by the President. Stop the murky compromises and the whining about “helping the unemployed.” Stop pretending this is about the deficit — nothing will hurt the deficit more than delayed economic growth. Say what [is] happening in terms of the national interest.

By my lights, Obama’s failure to effectively explain the Recovery Act to the American people back in 2009 will go down as one of the biggest PR blunders of the decade. The Recovery Act was, of course, the largest middle class tax cut and jobs creation program in American history — yet most Americans don’t know that. Only 12% (of 95%) know that Obama lowered their taxes; journalists continue to report widespread confusion between the righteous “stimulus package” and the devil’s bargain bailouts; and even in districts that benefited hugely from the bill, Obama is widely blamed for the downturn, as George Packer reports in his classic “Obama’s Lost Year.”

And here we go again, with the so-called “deficit hawks.” I’m with Professor Skocpol: enough with the carefully-wrought explanations of Keynesian countercyclical fiscal policy (as, for example, Larry Summers gives us here and Paul Krugman here). Keynes can be counterintuitive (re: why spend more during a depression, when you have less?) and economics is confusing. In this case, the message is blindingly simple — being for austerity means being against job creation and against economic growth.

Whether this president, who’s failed again and again to effectively communicate his policy goals to the American people, let alone give us some sort of positive progressive vision for this country, can deliver that message — that’s another question entirely.

Related posts:

Obama Mad Libs
Biden and Gibbs Mad Libs
Social Studies Walkout: Video
Google Sells Out
  • Will Rafey

    I cannot agree more with Skocpol’s comment about the Republican party.

    I remember sitting in David Plouffe’s talk to the Harvard College Dems in April/May of 2009 (so over a year ago) and he straightforwardly said that the Democrats captured virtually all of the seats they possibly could have in the 2008 election. Pretty much every Republican congressman is in such a thoroughly red district that there’s almost zero chance of them not getting re-elected.

    In other words, the Republican party has nothing to lose, and everything to gain — their entire agenda is bent on screwing as much up as they can so that the Obama administration and the Democratic Congress looks bad going into the 2010 midterms.

    I’ve had this frame of mind for over a year, and everything I’ve seen on the political landscape confirms this strategic paradigm of the GOP.

  • Max Novendstern

    Republicans have been playing extremely politics. Even if one doesn’t take the conspiratorial view that Republicans are literally trying to keep the American economy depressed (as Skocpol seems to be implying when she says “Republicans have figured out that if they undercut economic recovery and increase unemployment rates, they will gain in the 2010 elections”), one still sees that their incentives to obstruct, to undermine Obama’s agenda while keeping one’s hands clean of its potential drawbacks, are greater than their incentives to participate…and that this calculation is totally independent of whether it actually helps the American people or not.

    Let’s remember that in the midst of the greatest depression since the 1930s, exactly ZERO Republicans in the house voted to pass the Recovery Act, despite widespread economic consensus and almost global participation in similar stimulus packages. Zero Republicans.

custom writing